L-1A Dismissed — Restaurant (2005): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in their appeal, as required by regulations. The petitioner's appeal letter did not address the director's reason for the initial denial, which was the failure to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF