Dismissed L-1A

L-1A Dismissed โ€” Restaurant And Property Development (2006): did not establish the beneficiary had one continuous year

๐Ÿ“… 2006-06-05 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Restaurant And Property Development

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had one continuous year of employment abroad within the three years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The petitioner argued that the qualifying period should be calculated from the beneficiary's first application for admission to the U.S. in a different status, but the AAO found that regulations unambiguously require the employment to be within three years of the petition's filing date.

Criteria Discussed

One Year Of Continuous Employment Abroad New Office Requirements Managerial Or Executive Capacity
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’