Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed โ Restaurant And Property Development (2006): did not establish the beneficiary had one continuous year
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had one continuous year of employment abroad within the three years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The petitioner argued that the qualifying period should be calculated from the beneficiary's first application for admission to the U.S. in a different status, but the AAO found that regulations unambiguously require the employment to be within three years of the petition's filing date.
Criteria Discussed
One Year Of Continuous Employment Abroad New Office Requirements Managerial Or Executive Capacity
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ