dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Restaurant And Property Development

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Restaurant And Property Development

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had one continuous year of employment abroad within the three years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The petitioner argued that the qualifying period should be calculated from the beneficiary's first application for admission to the U.S. in a different status, but the AAO found that regulations unambiguously require the employment to be within three years of the petition's filing date.

Criteria Discussed

One Year Of Continuous Employment Abroad New Office Requirements Managerial Or Executive Capacity

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.

Start a Stronger Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.