dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Retail
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected on procedural grounds, not on the merits of the case. The AAO found that the appeal was improperly filed by counsel for the beneficiary, as the beneficiary is not a recognized party with standing to file an appeal in such proceedings.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity Proper Party To File An Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Hnmeland Security 20 Mass Ave.. N. W.. Room A3042 Washing!on. DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship ---to and Immigration -- -- PUBLIC. COPY File: SRC 03 101 52543 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: Dm 2 2 ?llol Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101 (a)(] 5)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1 101 (a)(15)(L) IN BEHALF OF BENEFICIARY: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. I ,' /- -> -- -?& /- Robef=W.Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office SRC 03 101 52543 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A). The petitioner is engaged in the operation of a convenience store. It seeks to extend the employment of its manager/president as an L-1 A nonirnmigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section 10 1 (a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 1101(a)(15)(L). The director denied the petition after determining that the petitioner has not sufficiently demonstrated that the beneficiary would be employed in the United States in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The AAO notes that although counsel indicates on the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal, that she represents the petitioner and the beneficiary, counsel entered her appearance as attorney only for the beneficiary on the Form G-28, Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative, that was submitted on appeal. The Form G-28 was signed by the beneficiary, apparently in his individual capacity and not as an authorized representative of the petitioner. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically prohibit a beneficiary of a visa petition, or a representative acting on a beneficiary's behalf, from filing a petition: the beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. $ 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary and his representative are not recognized parties, counsel is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. # 103,3(a)(l)(iii)(B). As the appeal was not properly filed, it will be rejected. 8 C.F.R. # 103.3(a)(d)(v)(A)(1). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.