dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Retail
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was improperly filed. The appeal was submitted by the beneficiary's counsel, but regulations prohibit a beneficiary from being a recognized party in the proceeding. As the beneficiary and their representative are not recognized parties, they are not authorized to file an appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Standing To Appeal Managerial Or Executive Capacity
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W , Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 identifying data deleted to prea dearler ~qnwammter' inv&o~ of oeE 11 p-9 PUBLIC COPY U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services File: WAC 04 007 50740 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: n()V 2 8 Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 10 1 (a)(15)(L) IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS : This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Administrative Appeals Office WAC 04 007 50740 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director, California Service Center denied the nonirnmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A). The petitioner is operates a retail store selling general merchandise. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as its general manager and has petitioned to classify the beneficiary as an L-1A nonimrnigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 9 1101(a)(15)(L). The director denied the petition after determining that the beneficiary will not be employed in a managerial or executive capacity. The Form G-28, Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative, that was submitted for the record was signed by the beneficiary in his personal capacity, not as an authorized representative of the petitioner. Counsel indicates on Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal, that he represents the beneficiary, not the petitioner. The MO notes that the name of the petitioning company is not identified on the Form G-28 or the Form I-290B. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically prohibit a beneficiary of a visa petition, or a representative acting on a beneficiary's behalf, from filing a petition; the beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. 9 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary and her representative are not recognized parties, counsel is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. tj 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). As the appeal was not properly filed, it will be rejected. 8 C.F.R. 9 103,3(a)(2)(v)(A)(l). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.