dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Retail

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Retail

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, as required by regulation, and did not submit a promised brief or additional evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Specific Error On Appeal (8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(A)(1)(V))

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF S-G-B- INC 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: NOV. 28.2017 
PETITION: FORM I-129. PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner. which describes its business as a ยท'Convenient Store:ยท seeks to temporarily employ the 
Beneficiary as an '"Executive Manager .. of its ne\v onice under the L-1 A nonimmigrant classification 
for intracompany transferees. See Immigration and Nationality Act section I 0 I (a)( 15)(L). 8 l: .S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(L). The L-1A classification allows a corporation or other legal entity (including its 
affiliate or subsidiary) to transfer a qualifying foreign employee to the United States to work 
temporarily in a managerial or executive capacity. 
The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on 
appeal. Upon review. we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal \vhen the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 1 03.3(a)(l )(v). 
The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an 
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form 
I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would 
be submitted within 30 days of the June 2. 2017, filing elate. HO\vcver. we haYe not received 
anything further from the Petitioner to elate. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific. 
erroneous conclusion of1aw or statement of fact in the Director's decision belovv. the appeal must he 
summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง I 03.3(a)( 1 )(v). 
Cite as Matter ofS-G-B-lnc. ID# 861714 (AAO Nov. 28. 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.