Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed — Retail (2018): did not meet a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the original decision. The petitioner indicated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted but failed to do so.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →