dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Retail

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Retail

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet procedural requirements. The petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted but failed to do so, thus not identifying any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact

View Full Decision Text

U.S. Citizenship . 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF N-R-E- LLC 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 13,2018 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a retail furniture outlet, seeks to extend the Beneticiary's temporary employment as 
President-CEO under the L-1 A nonimmigrant classitication tor intracompany transferees. See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section IOI(a)(l5)(L), 8 U.S.C. § 110l(a)(l5)(L). The 
Director of the California Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now betore us on appeal. 
Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
' An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specitically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § I 03.3(a)(l )(v). 
The statement the .Petitioner submitted in support of the appeal does not specifically identify an 
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form 1-
2908, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be 
submitted within 30 days of tiling. However, we have not received anything further from the 
Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identitied any specific, erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § l03.3(a)(l )(v). 
Cite as Maller o(N-R-E- U.C,lD# 1363471 (AAO Apr. 13, 2018)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.