dismissed L-1A

dismissed L-1A Case: Retail

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Retail

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove the beneficiary had one continuous year of employment abroad within the three years preceding the petition's filing. The beneficiary had been present in the United States since May 1999, almost four years prior to the March 2003 filing date. The AAO rejected the argument that the beneficiary's time in the U.S. in B-1 and F-1 student status was on behalf of the foreign employer and should not count as an interruption of the foreign employment.

Criteria Discussed

One Continuous Year Of Full-Time Employment Abroad Employment Within The Three Years Preceding The Filing Of The Petition Interruptive Vs. Non-Interruptive Periods Spent In The United States

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.

Start a Stronger Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.