L-1A Dismissed — Sales (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required by regulation. The director had initially denied the petition because the petitioner failed to establish that its new U.S. office had been doing business for the required one-year period.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF