Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed — Unknown (2006): the appeal, which was treated as a motion, was dismissed
Decision Summary
The appeal, which was treated as a motion, was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel formally withdrew it. The AAO also noted in a footnote that the motion would have been dismissed anyway for failing to meet procedural requirements, as it was not addressed to the proper office and failed to state new facts or cite an error of law.
Criteria Discussed
Motion To Reopen/Reconsider Requirements Under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(A)(4) Addressing The Motion To The Official Having Jurisdiction Per 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(A)(L)(Iii)(D) Stating New Facts For A Motion To Reopen Per 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(A)(2) Demonstrating An Error Of Law For A Motion To Reconsider Per 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(A)(3)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →