dismissed L-1A Case: Unknown

identifying data deleted. to 
prevent clearly unwarranted 
invasion nf personal privacy 
~ 
MtlfcrC~\t-, 
U.S.Dcpiutment of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washin2ton. DC 20529-2090 
. U.S. Citizenship 
and lIIi.migration 
Services 
b7 
DATE; DEC 0 5 2011 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER FILE: 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(l5)(L) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.c. § ,1101(a)(l5)(L) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents 
related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that 
any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional 
information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The 
specific requirements' for filing such a request can be found at 8 c.F.R. §.103.5. All motions must be 
submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, 
with a fee of $630. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. § ·103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must be filed 
within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks t9 reconsider or reopen. 
Thank you, 
t./a--... 
r--Perry Rfiew 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, California Service Center, denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is 
now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The AAO will dismiss the appeal. 
The petitioner filed this 'nonimmigrant petition seeking to extend the beneficiary's L-IA status pursuant to 
section IOI(a)(lS)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1l01(a)(IS)(L), as an 
i~tracompany transferee employed in a managerial or executive capacity. . 
The director denied the petition on October 8, 2009, concluding th~t the petitioner failed to establish that the 
beneficiary would be employed in the United States in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The 
petitioner filed a timely appeal. 
A review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that the beneficiary of this 
petition was also the beneficiary of an approved employment-based immigrant petition (Form 1-140) filed by the 
petitioner, and !hat he has adjusted status to that of a U.S. permanent resident as of April 6, 2010. While the 
petitioner has not w,ithdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, it would appear that the beneficiary is presently a 
lawful permanent resident and the issues in this proceeding are m@ot. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.