L-1A Remanded — Automotive Components (2024): the decision was remanded because the Director's denial

Decision Summary

The decision was remanded because the Director's denial relied on issues not clearly raised in the request for evidence, specifically concerning unexplained technical language in job descriptions. The petitioner submitted new evidence on appeal, including revised job descriptions and a letter from a state official, which the Director had not yet reviewed. The AAO also found that the record required further development to clarify whether the Beneficiary, or his superior, would be the one primarily managing the essential function of quality control.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF