remanded L-1A

remanded L-1A Case: Electronics

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Electronics

Decision Summary

The director initially denied the L-1A new office extension, concluding the petitioner had not proven it was 'doing business' for the entire previous year. On appeal, the petitioner submitted sufficient new evidence, such as invoices and retailer agreements, to persuade the AAO that it had been continuously providing services since its inception. The AAO withdrew the director's decision but remanded the case for further review of other unresolved eligibility questions.

Criteria Discussed

Doing Business For The Previous Year New Office Extension Requirements Qualifying Organizations

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Draft your L-1A petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.