Remanded
L-1A
L-1A Remanded — Investments (2019): the Director provided an incorrect legal analysis and did
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director provided an incorrect legal analysis and did not adequately discuss the submitted evidence. Although the AAO also found the current record insufficient to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial capacity or that the petitioner had been doing business for the required year, the case was sent back for a new decision to allow the petitioner to submit additional evidence.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity New Office Requirements Doing Business For The Previous Year
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →