L-1A Remanded — Media (2022): the Director's revocation decision was based on a flawed

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the Director's revocation decision was based on a flawed investigation. The AAO found that the investigative report lacked specific, concrete facts, such as an interview transcript or contact information for a key witness, which denied the Petitioner a meaningful opportunity to challenge the findings. The Director also failed to provide an analysis of the Beneficiary's foreign employment capacity and may have confused two similarly named companies.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF