L-1A Remanded — Renewable Energy (2018): the AAO found that the Director erred in determining the

Decision Summary

The AAO found that the Director erred in determining the petitioner did not qualify as a 'new office' and that the beneficiary would not be employed in a managerial capacity. However, the case was remanded because the record did not sufficiently establish that the new office would be 'doing business' (providing goods/services) within one year of approval, and the Director was instructed to request further evidence on this issue.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF