L-1A Remanded — Restaurant: the director's denial was based on significant factual

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded because the director's denial was based on significant factual errors, confusing the petitioner (a restaurant with 22 employees) with an unrelated cattle importing company. The director's analysis of the beneficiary's proposed role, subordinates, and business operations was factually incorrect. The case was sent back for a new decision based on the correct evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF