remanded L-1A Case: Sporting Goods
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director incorrectly adjudicated the petition by failing to apply the specific, more lenient regulations for a 'new office.' The director's denial was based on the petitioner's current low staffing levels, but the correct standard requires showing the U.S. operation will support a manager within one year. The AAO found the record still lacked sufficient evidence to meet this new office standard and sent the case back for re-adjudication.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your L-1A petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.