sustained L-1A Case: Satellite Manufacturing

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the director erred in concluding that the beneficiary had not met the one-year continuous foreign employment requirement within the three years preceding the petition. The director only considered the beneficiary's most recent ten months of employment, overlooking a prior period from August 2005 to August 2006 which fulfilled the one-year mandate. The AAO found the evidence submitted on appeal, corroborating this earlier employment, to be persuasive and withdrew the director's finding.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF