O-1A Dismissed โ Business (2014): did not meet three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required three evidentiary criteria. While the director and AAO agreed that two criteria (critical/essential employment and high salary) were met, the petitioner's argument for meeting a third via 'comparable evidence' was rejected. The AAO found that the petitioner did not establish that the standard evidentiary criteria do not readily apply to the beneficiary's occupation, which is a prerequisite for submitting comparable evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.