O-1A Dismissed โ Ski Coaching (2020): did not establish the beneficiary met the required minimum
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria for O-1 classification. The AAO found the evidence submitted for the 'awards' criterion was insufficient, as it did not establish the national or international recognition of the awards or show they were for excellence in her specific field as a ski coach. Because the petitioner could not meet the threshold evidentiary requirement, the appeal was dismissed.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.