Remanded
O-1A
O-1A Remanded โ Art Management: of significant inconsistencies regarding the petitioner's
Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because of significant inconsistencies regarding the petitioner's business. While the petitioner claimed to operate an art gallery and cultural exchange, its own website indicated it was a limousine and tour service company, creating doubt about the nature of the business and the proposed employment for the beneficiary.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an O-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Determination Of Correct Evidentiary Standard (O-1A Vs. O-1B) Nature Of Petitioner'S Business Nature Of Proposed Employment
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own O-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.