dismissed
O-1B
dismissed O-1B Case: Dance
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the director's decision. The petitioner did not contest any of the director's findings or offer any substantive basis for the appeal, which mandates a summary dismissal under the regulations.
Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. § 214.2(O)(3)(Iv)(A) 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(O)(3)(Iv)(B)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
(b)(6) DATErEB 0 2 2015 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: U.S. :Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washinl!lon. DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker under Section 101(a)(15)(0)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(0)(i) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. This is a non-precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency policy through non-precedent decisions. If you believe the AAO incorrectly applied current law or policy to your case or if you seek to present new facts for consideration, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen, respectively. Any motion must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this decision. Please review the Form I-290B instructions at http:Uwww.uscis.gov/forms for the latest information on fee, filing location, and other requirements. See also 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. Do not file a motion directly with the AAO. ;£ o k Ron Rosenberg Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov (b)(6) NON-PRECEDENT DECISION Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. We will dismiss the appeal. The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary, a dancer, as an 0-1B nonimmigrant pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(0)(i) of the hnmigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(0)(i), as an alien of extraordinary ability in the arts. Mter issuing a request for evidence and then considering the evidence of record, the director denied the petition, finding that the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary qualifies as an alien of extraordinary ability in the arts. The director determined that the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary meets the evidentiary criterion at 8 C.P.R.§ 214.2(o)(3)(iv)(A), and that the submitted evidence did not satisfy any of the six evidentiary criteria set forth at 8 C.P.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iv)(B), of which the petitioner must meet three to establish the beneficiary's eligibility. The regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 103.3(a)(1)(v) provides that "[a]n officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal." In addition, Part 4 of Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, states that the petitioner "must provide a statement regarding the basis for the appeal or motion."1 The petitioner indicated in Part 3 that "[n]o supplemental brief and/or additional evidence will be submitted" and did not submit a statement or any evidence on appeal. Rather, the petitioner submitted a cover letter listing the documents enclosed: Form I-290B with payment and a copy of the director's decision. In this matter, the petitioner has not identified an erroneous conclusion of law or a statement of fact in the director's decision. As the petitioner did not contest any of the specific findings of the director and offers no substantive basis for the filing of the appeal, the regulations mandate the summary dismissal of the appeal. The appeal will be dismissed for the above stated reasons. In visa petition proceedings, it is the petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361; Matter of Otiende, 26 I&N Dec. 127, 128 (BIA 2013). Here, that burden has not been met. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 1 Every benefit request submitted to USCIS must be executed and filed in accordance with the form instructions. Form instructions are incorporated into the regulations under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(l).
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.