dismissed O-1B Case: Motion Picture Or Television

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF 0-A-R-
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: MAR. 23,2018 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an individual, seeks to classify the Beneficiary as a foreign national of extraordinary 
achievement in the motion picture or television industry. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the 
Act) section I 0 l(a)(l5)(0)(i), 8 U.S.C. § II 01 (a)(l5)(0)(i). The Director of the California Service 
Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily 
dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specitically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). 
The statement the Petitioner submitted in support of the appeal does not specifically identify an 
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-
290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence is attached 
to the appeal. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or 
statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1 03.3(a)( 1 )(v). 
Cite as Maller of D-A-R-, ID# 1445284 (AAO Mar. 23, 20 18)