Can film & television professionals get an O-1B? What 30 AAO decisions say
Published AAO non-precedent decisions, 2001–2024 · updated 2026-10-16
Between 2001 and 2024 the AAO published 30 O-1B appeal decisions from film & television petitioners and sustained none of them. These are appeals of denials, not all adjudications, so the dismissal rate is not an initial-filing approval rate; it shows which arguments the AAO rejected on appeal and which it accepted.
What the decisions say
No O-1B appeal from film & television petitioners was sustained in this period. The record shows what did not work; it does not show what would.
Outcomes by Year
| Year | Dismissed | Sustained | Remanded | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 3 (—) | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 3 (—) | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1 (—) | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2014 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 2 (—) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 0 (—) | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1 (—) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Criteria Breakdown
| Criterion | In Dismissed | In Sustained | Total | Dismissal Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading or critical role | 24 | 0 | 26 | 92.3% |
| Significant recognition | 21 | 0 | 24 | 87.5% |
| Awards or prizes | 17 | 0 | 19 | — |
| High salary or remuneration | 9 | 0 | 10 | — |
Example Decisions
Dismissed2024-10-15The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO found the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of the…
Dismissed2023-04-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO found the evidence insufficient to prove the beneficiary would…
Dismissed2022-10-14The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria for O-1B classification. The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable…
Dismissed2021-04-06The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner submitted conflicting information regarding the beneficiary's employment terms and compensation, which raised questions about its status as a bona fide employer.…
Dismissed2018-06-13The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria for extraordinary achievement in the motion picture industry. The AAO…
Sample: published AAO non-precedent decisions collected from uscis.gov, 2001–2024. These are appeals, not all USCIS adjudications; approval rates here are not initial-filing approval rates. Read our full methodology.
Get Your Free Strategy Preview →