O-1A Appeals: Martial Arts

Last updated 2026-09-02

The AAO dismissed 87.5% of O-1A appeals from Martial Arts petitioners in published non-precedent decisions from 2004–2024 (n=32). The criterion most often at issue was Awards or prizes.

Outcomes by Year

YearDismissedSustainedRemandedTotal
20241 (—)001
20231 (—)012
20222 (—)002
20201 (—)001
20162 (—)002
20153 (—)003
20131 (—)001
20112 (—)002
20102 (—)002
20091 (—)012
20073 (—)003
20063 (—)115
20052 (—)002
20041 (—)001

Criteria Breakdown

CriterionIn DismissedIn SustainedTotalDismissal Rate
Awards or prizes2913290.6%
Membership in associations15117
Sustained acclaim/extraordinary ability12014
Published material8110

Example Decisions

Sustained2006-03-29The appeal was sustained because the director applied an incorrect legal standard by requiring the petitioner to establi Dismissed2024-10-17The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the required number of ev Dismissed2023-02-14The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the req Dismissed2022-10-04The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met the minimum of three requ Dismissed2022-05-26The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the req Dismissed2016-09-26The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit a mandatory written advisory opinion from an appropriat
Denied cases most often lacked sufficient documentary evidence to meet the evidentiary standard.

Sample: published AAO non-precedent decisions collected from uscis.gov, 2004–2024. These are appeals, not all USCIS adjudications; approval rates here are not initial-filing approval rates. Read our full methodology.

Filing your own O-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria — free strategy preview.
Get Your Free Strategy Preview →