Dismissed
E-2
E-2 Dismissed โ Pet Supplies (2017): the motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the AAO lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Federal regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.1(c)(5), state there is no appeal from the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. Since the original decision was not appealable, the AAO has no jurisdiction to review subsequent motions.
Criteria Discussed
Jurisdiction 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.1(C)(5) 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(A)(6)
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ