Dismissed E-2

E-2 Dismissed โ€” Pet Supplies (2017): the motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the

๐Ÿ“… 2017-01-13 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Pet Supplies

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the AAO lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Federal regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.1(c)(5), state there is no appeal from the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. Since the original decision was not appealable, the AAO has no jurisdiction to review subsequent motions.

Criteria Discussed

Jurisdiction 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.1(C)(5) 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(A)(6)
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’