dismissed
E-2
dismissed E-2 Case: Pet Supplies
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the AAO lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Federal regulations, specifically 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(c)(5), state there is no appeal from the denial of an application for an extension of stay for an E-2 treaty investor. Since the original decision was not appealable, the AAO has no jurisdiction to review subsequent motions.
Criteria Discussed
Jurisdiction 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(C)(5) 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(A)(6)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.