Dismissed
E-2
E-2 Dismissed — Retail (2017): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the AAO lacks
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the AAO lacks jurisdiction over the denial of an E-2 application for an extension of stay. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(c)(5), there is no appeal from such a denial. Because the original decision was not appealable, the AAO has no authority to review subsequent motions related to it.
Criteria Discussed
Jurisdiction Appeal Rights For E-2 Extension Of Stay Motions On Non-Appealable Decisions
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more E-2 decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →