EB-1B Dismissed — Electronics Engineering (2006): the evidence did not establish the beneficiary's

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence did not establish the beneficiary's international recognition as outstanding. The AAO found that peer-reviewing manuscripts and advising a Ph.D. student were routine academic activities, not proof of being an acclaimed judge of others' work. Furthermore, a pending patent and conference presentations were considered insufficient evidence of original contributions without proof of widespread impact or implementation in the field.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF