EB-1B Dismissed — Engineering (2005): did not establish the beneficiary is recognized

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as outstanding. The beneficiary's peer review activities were considered routine for the academic field, and the evidence for his original contributions, such as a pending patent and conference presentations, did not demonstrate significant impact or widespread recognition.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF