dismissed EB-1B

dismissed EB-1B Case: Engineering

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Engineering

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because, despite the Beneficiary meeting three of the initial evidentiary criteria, the AAO concluded that the evidence in its totality did not establish that he is internationally recognized as outstanding in his field. The decision noted that the Beneficiary's participation in peer review was a routine academic activity and not indicative of the high level of achievement required for the classification.

Criteria Discussed

Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Or Scholarly Research Contributions Authorship Of Scholarly Articles

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.

Start a Stronger Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.