EB-1B Dismissed — Mechanical Engineering (2018): although the petitioner submitted evidence under two

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because although the petitioner submitted evidence under two regulatory criteria (judging the work of others and scholarly articles), this evidence was found to reflect routine duties and not to establish the beneficiary's international recognition. Additionally, the AAO found that the petitioner failed to submit the actual job offer letter addressed to the beneficiary, which is a required piece of initial evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF