EB-1B Remanded — Engineering (2005): the appeal was remanded, not on its merits, but because the

Decision Summary

The appeal was remanded, not on its merits, but because the AAO discovered new, derogatory information on the petitioner's own website that contradicted its claims. The case was sent back to the director to give the petitioner an opportunity to respond to this information. The initial denial was based on the petitioner's failure to prove it had offered the beneficiary a permanent research position, as the evidence suggested an annually renewable appointment contingent on funding and performance.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF