Remanded
EB-1B
EB-1B Remanded — Research (2006): the AAO found that the director erred in determining the
Decision Summary
The AAO found that the director erred in determining the job offer was not permanent, concluding that the position met the regulatory definition. However, the case was remanded because the director's analysis of the beneficiary's international recognition as outstanding was insufficient, requiring a more thorough evaluation of the evidence submitted to meet the required criteria.
Criteria Discussed
Permanent Job Offer Major Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Beneficiary Original Contributions Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →