sustained
EB-1B
sustained EB-1B Case: Computer Science
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director had mischaracterized the beneficiary's publication record. The AAO found that the director undercounted the beneficiary's articles and was incorrect about his primary authorship, and that the evidence, including 13 articles and citations, was sufficient to meet the authorship criterion. As the beneficiary met this criterion in addition to the judging criterion, the petition was approved.
Criteria Discussed
3 Years Of Experience Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.