EB-1B Sustained — Computer Science: the director had mischaracterized the beneficiary's

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the director had mischaracterized the beneficiary's publication record. The AAO found that the director undercounted the beneficiary's articles and was incorrect about his primary authorship, and that the evidence, including 13 articles and citations, was sufficient to meet the authorship criterion. As the beneficiary met this criterion in addition to the judging criterion, the petition was approved.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF