EB-1B Sustained — Environmental Science (2005): the director initially found the beneficiary only met the

Decision Summary

The director initially found the beneficiary only met the criterion for authorship of scholarly articles. On appeal, the petitioner submitted additional evidence demonstrating the beneficiary's participation as a judge of the work of others, including editing numerous research reports. The AAO determined this new evidence was sufficient to meet a second regulatory criterion, thus qualifying the beneficiary as an outstanding researcher.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF