sustained
EB-1B
sustained EB-1B Case: Environmental Science
Avoid this EB-1B denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The director initially found the beneficiary only met the criterion for authorship of scholarly articles. On appeal, the petitioner submitted additional evidence demonstrating the beneficiary's participation as a judge of the work of others, including editing numerous research reports. The AAO determined this new evidence was sufficient to meet a second regulatory criterion, thus qualifying the beneficiary as an outstanding researcher.
Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Books Or Articles Participation As The Judge Of The Work Of Others
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.