Sustained
EB-1B
EB-1B Sustained โ Pharmaceutical Science (2007): the AAO found that the director failed to give sufficient
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the director failed to give sufficient weight to the evidence for two criteria. The AAO was persuaded that the beneficiary's position on an editorial board was more significant than routine peer-review, and that the beneficiary's well-cited publication record was indicative of international recognition, thus satisfying the requirements.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ