sustained
EB-1B
sustained EB-1B Case: Pharmaceutical Science
Avoid this EB-1B denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the director failed to give sufficient weight to the evidence for two criteria. The AAO was persuaded that the beneficiary's position on an editorial board was more significant than routine peer-review, and that the beneficiary's well-cited publication record was indicative of international recognition, thus satisfying the requirements.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.