dismissed
EB-2
dismissed EB-2 Case: Petroleum Engineering
Decision Summary
The motion to reconsider was denied because it was untimely filed. The petitioner's motion was received by USCIS on the 34th day after the decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day filing deadline. The decision clarifies that the filing date is the date of receipt, not the date of mailing, and also notes the motion failed to include a required statement about judicial proceedings.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Motion To Reconsider Date Of Filing Definition
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF 0-M-0- Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: OCT. 14, 2015 MOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a petroleum engineer, seeks classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act)§ 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. We dismissed a subsequent appeal. The Petitioner filed motions to reopen and reconsider which were also dismissed. The matter is now before us on motion to reconsider. The motion will be denied. In order to properly file a motion to reconsider, the regulation at 8 C.P.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) provides that the petitioner must file the motion within 30 days of the decision. If the decision was mailed, the motion must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.P.R.§ 103.8(b). The regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 1.2 explains that when the last day of a period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period shall run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The record indicates that we issued our latest decision on May 8, 2015. We properly gave notice to the Petitioner that he had 33 days to file a motion. The Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) was received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on Thursday, June 11, 2015, or 34 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the motion to reconsider was untimely filed. On motion, the Petitioner cites the regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 103.8(b) and asserts that his Form I-290B was timely filed because "[s]ervice by mail is complete upon mailing." The regulation at 8 C.P.R. § 103.8 concerns "authorized means of service by the Service on parties and on attorneys" and not submissions from applicants, petitioners, or their attorneys to USCIS. In this matter, the date of filing is not the date the Form I-290B was mailed by the Petitioner, but the date of actual receipt at the designated location with the proper signature and the required fee. See 8 C.P.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i). Accordingly, as the motion was not received within 33 days of our latest decision, the motion was untimely filed and must be denied. In addition, the instant motion does not contain the statement about whether or not the validity of the unfavorable decision has been or is the subject of any judicial proceeding as required by the regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C). The regulation at 8 C.P.R. § 103.5(a)(4) states that "[a] motion that does not meet applicable requirements shall be dismissed." Accordingly, the motion will be denied and our previous decisions will not be disturbed. Matter of 0-M-0- ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied. Cite as Matter ofO-M-0-, ID# 14808 (AAO Oct. 14, 2015) 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.