dismissed EB-2

dismissed EB-2 Case: Petroleum Engineering

📅 Date unknown 👤 Individual 📂 Petroleum Engineering

Decision Summary

The motion to reconsider was denied because it was untimely filed. The petitioner's motion was received by USCIS on the 34th day after the decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day filing deadline. The decision clarifies that the filing date is the date of receipt, not the date of mailing, and also notes the motion failed to include a required statement about judicial proceedings.

Criteria Discussed

Timeliness Of Motion To Reconsider Date Of Filing Definition

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF 0-M-0-
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: OCT. 14, 2015 
MOTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION 
FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a petroleum engineer, seeks classification as a member of the professions holding an 
advanced degree. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act)§ 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). 
The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. We dismissed a subsequent 
appeal. The Petitioner filed motions to reopen and reconsider which were also dismissed. The 
matter is now before us on motion to reconsider. The motion will be denied. 
In order to properly file a motion to reconsider, the regulation at 8 C.P.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) provides 
that the petitioner must file the motion within 30 days of the decision. If the decision was mailed, 
the motion must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.P.R.§ 103.8(b). The regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 1.2 
explains that when the last day of a period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period 
shall run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. 
The record indicates that we issued our latest decision on May 8, 2015. We properly gave notice to 
the Petitioner that he had 33 days to file a motion. The Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) 
was received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on Thursday, June 11, 2015, or 
34 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the motion to reconsider was untimely filed. 
On motion, the Petitioner cites the regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 103.8(b) and asserts that his Form I-290B 
was timely filed because "[s]ervice by mail is complete upon mailing." The regulation at 8 C.P.R. 
§ 103.8 concerns "authorized means of service by the Service on parties and on attorneys" and not 
submissions from applicants, petitioners, or their attorneys to USCIS. In this matter, the date of 
filing is not the date the Form I-290B was mailed by the Petitioner, but the date of actual receipt at 
the designated location with the proper signature and the required fee. See 8 C.P.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i). 
Accordingly, as the motion was not received within 33 days of our latest decision, the motion was 
untimely filed and must be denied. In addition, the instant motion does not contain the statement 
about whether or not the validity of the unfavorable decision has been or is the subject of any 
judicial proceeding as required by the regulation at 8 C.P.R.§ 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C). 
The regulation at 8 C.P.R. § 103.5(a)(4) states that "[a] motion that does not meet applicable 
requirements shall be dismissed." Accordingly, the motion will be denied and our previous decisions 
will not be disturbed. 
Matter of 0-M-0-
ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied. 
Cite as Matter ofO-M-0-, ID# 14808 (AAO Oct. 14, 2015) 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.