EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Legal Consulting (2025): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide new facts or evidence to overcome previous findings. The petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional, as the evidence for five years of progressive experience was deficient. Additionally, she failed to demonstrate that her proposed endeavor in legal consulting had the requisite 'national importance' beyond her own clients, as her evidence was too generalized.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.