Dismissed
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Dismissed — Legal Consulting (2024): did not establish new, material evidence to overcome the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide new, material evidence to overcome the prior decision. The AAO maintained its finding that the petitioner did not establish her proposed legal consulting endeavor would have 'national importance,' as the evidence lacked specificity regarding broader implications for the industry, significant U.S. employment potential, or substantial positive economic effects beyond her own clientele.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
National Importance (Dhanasar Prong 1) Potential To Employ U.S. Workers Positive Economic Effects Advanced Degree Holder Qualification
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.