Remanded
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Remanded — Information Technology (2024): the Director issued contradictory Requests for Evidence
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director issued contradictory Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and made contradictory statements in the denial notice regarding the petitioner's eligibility under the second prong of the Dhanasar framework. The AAO found that the denial did not provide a sufficient explanation of its reasoning, which prevented the petitioner from adequately preparing a substantive appeal.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Substantial Merit And National Importance Well-Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor On Balance, Waiving The Job Offer Requirement Would Benefit The United States
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.