Remanded
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Remanded — Inorganic Chemistry (2024): the Director failed to properly analyze the petitioner's
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to properly analyze the petitioner's proposed endeavor and did not provide a meaningful analysis of the submitted evidence. The AAO concluded the Director erred by not fully considering the record and ordered a re-evaluation of all three prongs of the Dhanasar framework.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Substantial Merit And National Importance Well Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor Balance Of Factors For Waiver Benefit To The U.S.
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.