Sustained
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Sustained — Inorganic Chemistry (2024): the AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusion that the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusion that the petitioner was not well-positioned to advance her endeavor. The AAO found that the Director had overlooked significant evidence, including letters from experts in the petitioner's field detailing their reliance on and interest in her research on metal complexes for cancer treatment and environmental applications. This evidence, upon de novo review, sufficiently established the petitioner's high standing and influence in her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Substantial Merit And National Importance Well Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor Balance Of Factors For Waiver Of Job Offer
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.