sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Cancer Biology
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner, a biological researcher, provided sufficient evidence of her past achievements in the field of hematology and cancer biology. The AAO found that her significant contributions, including developing new drug therapies and murine models for cancer research, justified the projection of future benefit to the national interest, thereby meeting the criteria for a national interest waiver.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.