EB-2 NIW Sustained โ Mathematics (2015): the Director denied the petition, finding the petitioner
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition, finding the petitioner failed to meet the third prong of the national interest waiver test by not demonstrating sufficient impact on his field. The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided substantial evidence, including high citation counts, peer review activities, and strong letters from independent experts, which demonstrated the significance, influence, and practical application of his work in high-dimensional statistics and machine learning.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.