L-1A Dismissed — Clothing (2020): did not establish it had been 'doing business' for the

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove it had been 'doing business' for the previous year, a requirement for a new office extension. The evidence submitted, such as invoices for undefined 'administrative and representative expenses' and uncorroborated purchase orders, did not establish the regular, systematic, and continuous provision of goods or services.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF