dismissed L-1A Case: Dental Products
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the original decision. Instead, the petitioner argued that its former counsel had provided inaccurate information, but failed to properly substantiate this claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The AAO also noted a petitioner may not make material changes to a petition on appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.