L-1A Dismissed — Dental Products (2005): did not meet a specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the original decision. Instead, the petitioner argued that its former counsel had provided inaccurate information, but failed to properly substantiate this claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The AAO also noted a petitioner may not make material changes to a petition on appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF