dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Import/Export
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was improperly filed. The appeal form was signed by the beneficiary, who is not a recognized party in the proceeding and is not authorized to file an appeal; only the petitioner has standing to appeal.
Criteria Discussed
One Year Of Continuous Employment Abroad Business Plan Of U.S. Entity Improper Filing Of Appeal By Beneficiary
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifyingdataddeted to preventclearlyunwarranted invasionofpersonalprivacy PUBLICCOPY U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rrn.3000 Washington, DC 20529 u.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services File: EAC 05 23051121 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: . ;fE8 0 1 200l INRE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(L) IN BEHALF OF BENEFICIARY: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. ~::/ Robert P. Wiemann, Chief Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov EAC 05 230 51121 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A). The petitioner claims to be engaged in the import and export business. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a manager, and has petitioned to classify the beneficiary as an L-IA nonimmigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(L). The director denied the petition after determining that the beneficiary did not have the requisite one year of continuous employment abroad with a qualified organization. Additionally, the petition was denied for failure by the petitioner to submit requested evidence establishing the business plan of the U.S. entity. The Form I-290B that was submitted for the record was signed by the beneficiary, not by an authorized representative of the petitioner. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically prohibit a beneficiary of a visa petition, or a representative acting on a beneficiary's behalf, from filing a petition; the beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary is not a recognized party, the beneficiary is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l )(iii)(B). As the appeal was not properly filed, it will be rejected. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(1). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.