dismissed L-1A Case: Import/Export

identiibg data aca 
pmvmt V Dm-fl 
~+~\~rnms op 0e;soaal Mmu9; 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
File: SRC 03 047 50184 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: I I 
Petition: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1101(a)(15)(L) 
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
obert P. Wiemann, Dir ctor 2- 
dministrative Appeals Office 
13 
SRC 03 047 50184 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The nonimrnigrant petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center, and is now before 
the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner is engaged in the import and export business. It seeks to extend the beneficiary's employment in 
the United States as its president pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the 
Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 1101(a)(15)(L). The director determined that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the 
beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity as required by the regulation at 
8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(1)(14)(ii). 
On appeal, the petitioner provides the following statement: 
We ask reconsideration for the Beneficiary's duties which undoubtedly meet Title 8, CFR, 
Section 214.2(L)(B) or (C) [sic]. 
In support of this statement, the petitioner submits its previously submitted response to the director's request for 
evidence. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The petitioner here has 
not addressed the reasons stated for the denial and has not provided any additional evidence other than that which 
was previously submitted prior to adjudication. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed.