L-1A Dismissed — Import/Export (2007): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The petitioner did not provide any new evidence to overcome the finding that the beneficiary would not be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, as the record indicated the beneficiary was the sole employee and would be performing the day-to-day operations of the business.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF